Robotic Milking Is Becoming A Huge Part Of The Dairy Industry

Robotic milking is becoming a huge part of the dairy industry today. Today, lactating cows are able to choose a time in which they want to be milked, and how often they want to be milked. The robotic milking machine will prep, milk, and post dip the cow without humans having to do the work manually (Figure One). Robots also give the farmers additional information about each individual cow. Farmers are able to choose which type of system flow they want for their animals, and what they think is best for their herd. The labor for robotic milking is less intense than the labor in tie stall/ stanchion barn, and can reduce the amount of employees the farmer has, which in return may help save the farmer money. Many farmers are switching to this new way of milking their cows, because of flexibility and increase in milk quality. Robotic milking is growing in the dairy industry and becoming more popular in the United States, and we are going to start seeing more farmers install them. When it comes to robotic milking, the farmer has different options on how they want their cows to flow through the milking machine. Cows who are milked through a robot can either have free access to the robot, or can be forced trafficked (also known as milk-first system), to the robot (Munksgaard et al., 2011). When cows have free access to the robot facility, the cows are able to access the feed and robot all hours of each and every day. They are able to walk into the robot freely whenever the robot isShow MoreRelatedStrategic Marketing Management337596 Words   |  1351 Pages 2005, Richard M.S. Wilson and Colin Gilligan. All rights reserved The right of Richard M.S. Wilson and Colin Gilligan to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission ofRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pages1 PART I 1 2 3 PERSONAL SKILLS 44 Developing Self-Awareness 45 Managing Personal Stress 105 Solving Problems Analytically and Creatively 167 PART II 4 5 6 7 INTERPERSONAL SKILLS 232 233 Building Relationships by Communicating Supportively Gaining Power and Influence 279 Motivating Others 323 Managing Conflict 373 PART III GROUP SKILLS 438 8 Empowering and Delegating 439 9 Building Effective Teams and Teamwork 489 10 Leading Positive Change 533 PART IV

Second Amendment to the US Constitution - 552 Words

Second Amendment A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. These are the words of the second amendment in the United States Constitution. The amendments guarantee america citizens the right to bear arms. This right grants men have the right to bear arms their for protection or for the militia they were served in. This amendment today should grant all civilians to own guns. The first Part of the second amendment deals with the militias. The States and community had militias who defended there community and state from Indian raids and revolts. They could be called on to defend the state in a time of crisis. Men who were between 16-60 were required to be part of their local militia. Almost every man during the time of militias in America had guns and for the few who didnt have guns had to pay a small fee. The second part deals with bear arms. Bear arms means you have some sort of weapon on you like a gun or taser. The second amendment does not explain what types of arms or what weapons were considered arms. But back then guns were as big as a problem today. The Second Amendment was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of 1689 were the government of England did not interfere with people that had guns in a time of peace and in war. Sir William Blackstone a english judge said that the English Bill of Rights were supporting the natural rights ofShow MoreRelatedComparison Between the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution991 Words   |  4 PagesConfederation. Shortly after that, a new document was formed to what we know as the Constitution of the United States. These documents were similar but more different at the same time with each other, and each granted specific powers to the national government. By throwing off the British monarchy it left the states without a central government. The states needed a new government and fast, which paved way for the first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was startedRead MoreChelsea Lim. Mrs. Polich. U.S. History: Period 7. 5 April972 Words   |  4 PagesChelsea Lim Mrs. Polich U.S. History: Period 7 5 April 2017 U.S. Constitution Essay When America first became a country, the government used the Articles of Confederation to govern the States, then known as the colonies. They later discovered that it did not give the central government enough power and made it weak. So, one day at a Constitutional Convention, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Founding Fathers came up with the Constitution for the new, growing country, and We the People. After they debatedRead MoreEssay on The Right to Bear Arms a Constitutional Conflict 1666 Words   |  7 Pagesunarmed Americans in Boston leading to an upsurge of revolutionary sentiment† (Henderson 88). This revolutionary conflict between Britain and America is what triggered the American War of Independence. It also influenced the creation of various constitutions and bills of rights, â€Å"under the new government the states would continue to be sovereign in most internal matters while the new national government would be supreme in areas such as foreign affairs† (Cornell 42). Although America gained its independenceRead MoreThe Cell Phone Education Regulation Act872 Words   |  4 PagesThe United States Constitution charged Congress with the authority to create agencies to determine legislative laws that are enforceable across the country. The Cell Phone Education Regulation Act created by Congress has the authority to develop laws regarding cell phone use in primary schools. As legislative powers cannot be transferred or delegated, was Congress proper in authorizing the Cellular Educational Service the power to enforce certain regulations through criminal penalties to primaryRead MoreThe Us Constitution And Its Impact On American Society Essay1252 Words   |  6 Pagesthe US constitution has been a major part of life here in America. It dictates our rights and freedoms that we still stand by to this day along with establishing certain laws that were necessary for a functional society at the beginning of America’s independence from Britain. For over 200 years, we have stood by one single document. Despite the numerous changes in society and government, the US constitution has stood the test of time and still continues to stay relevant to this day. The US constitutionRead MoreGeorge Orwell s The Constitution Of The United States973 Words   |  4 PagesThere is a lot of nations who unlikely to us count with Kings and Dictators. In England Queen Elizabeth II, has not much power over decision or passing laws for example, the prime minister and the parliament are in charge on this because there monarchy believes in constitution. On the other hand there is dictators like Fidel Castro who ruled Cuba for more than five decades, assigning his position to his brother Raul Castro. He became the only party who will rule Cuba, but the most famous one whoRead MoreHow Of The Second Amendment1271 Words   |  6 PagesHow to Interpret the Second Amendment The Constitution was signed on September 17, 1789. The federalists declared that the Constitution granted the new government limited powers. Anti-federalists, such as George Mason, sought after a stronger confirmation from the federal government that certain rights would not be encroached upon. After just recently breaking away from Great Britain, it is understandable that the Founding Fathers feared the rise of another domineering government. Mason wroteRead MoreDrawing Influence From Levinson ( 1989 )1060 Words   |  5 Pagesonce again, I would like to argue that there is not or should not be an understanding that the Second Amendment is of greater importance and a higher degree of static understanding than other aspects of the Constitution. Levinson critiques this condition of the American population as follows; â€Å"If one does accept the plausibility of any of the arguments on behalf of a strong reading of the Second Amendment, but, nevertheless, rejects them in the nam e of social prudence and the present-day consequencesRead MoreState Constitutions Have Many Functions876 Words   |  4 PagesState constitutions have many functions. A state constitution defines the powers given to political institutions and also to individuals. For example, the Bill of Rights in the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights in the Texas Constitution â€Å"provides specific freedoms to the citizens and limits the power of the government.† (Vocabulary.com) The constitution also prevents any one person, persons or political office from becoming too powerful by using a system of checks and balances. State constitutionsRead MoreThe Government s Debate On Gun Violence1256 Words   |  6 PagesGovernment tries to convince us what they appear. Both Political parties agree that something must be done in order to stop the gun violence is at an all-time high in the United States. Since January, there have been at least 354 mass shootings cases in about 220 cities in 47 states, this involves shootings that leave four or more dead or wounded (LaFraniere, 2015). While the mass shootings that we hear about are horrendous, our Government is responsibility to protect us without completely fringing

The Differences Between Parliamentary Presidential System Free Essays

Differences between Parliamentary system and Presidential system [Judiciary] In relating both systems, parliamentary and presidential systems are currently using different judiciary system to enforce law in society. Before entering judiciary segment, it is essential to understand the definition of judiciary where it can be noted that:- â€Å"†¦Judiciary is commonly considered the third branch of government. It stabilizes the political system by solving disputes involving the country’s law†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Barrington, 2010, p. We will write a custom essay sample on The Differences Between Parliamentary Presidential System or any similar topic only for you Order Now 280) â€Å"†¦It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is†¦Ã¢â‚¬  John Marshall cited in (Woll, 1992, p. 51) From this definition above, the judiciary simply implies the body or branch that play important role in interpretation of the law and solving matters relating to legal issue. Both Parliamentary and Presidential system does also exhibit Judiciary bodies but portrays different function to one another where it can be noted that:- In United Kingdom: – â€Å"†¦Their jurisdiction over civil cases extended to the United Kingdom as a whole but only for England, Wales and Northern Island in criminal†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Barrington, 2010, p. 85) Meaning to say that â€Å"Law of Lords† have jurisdiction in for the whole states in United Kingdom, but in England, Wales, and Northern Island the Law of Lord are function in decision making of criminal cases. This different with United States of America which is â€Å"â € ¦The doctrine of separation of power operates on two levels. On the national level, the authority of the federal government is divided among three distinct competitive and mutually involved branches. On another level, power is split between national and state government†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Woll, 1992, p. 255) From the quotation above show that separations of power have two levels, for the first level is in the federal government have three branches which are Legislature, Judiciary and Executive that different with each other but it actually involved each other to ensure that the government run smoothly. Another difference between these two countries is the Constitution. In United Kingdom constitutional are unwritten that is different with United States of America that have written Constitution from the beginning of United State are founded. Law in United States of America are recorded. In United Kingdom the House of Lords are consisting twelve â€Å"Lords of Appeal in Ordinary† that also called â€Å"Law of Lords†. In United Kingdom are applying the independence of judiciary which is needed to be:- United Kingdom:- â€Å"†¦insulated from scrutiny, general accountability for their role or properly made public criticisms of conduct inside or outside the court room†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ (Lords, 2007, p. 13) Contra with United States of America that:- â€Å"Although the states were no longer equal to the central government, they still retained a fair amount of sovereignty. As long as they did not conflict with the Constitution of Federal laws, state laws were supreme within each state, that is, within its own domain†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Woll, 1992, p. 257) Meaning to say that judiciary in United Kingdom are isolated from the Executive and Parliament in way to protected it from be review and need to criticise in proper way wherever outside or inside the courts room. In United Kingdom legal system are based on three sources that are Case Law, Legislation and Statutory of Laws (Act of Parliament). In the other hand United States of America there are Federalism and the Judiciary. Judiciary in State and National have issue on sovereignty and have been settling by Civil War which is bringing the inequalities to the states then central government. From the statement above can show that the judiciary part in United States of America which is both state and federal government have a same sovereignty in this country as long as the law are not contradict with Constitution of Federal law. This is different with United Kingdom that used the Fusion of power which is all branch of government are mixed up each other because in United Kingdom are using the parliamentary system. Administration of law in United Kingdom is different with United States of America, this can shown in:- â€Å"†¦The United Kingdom does not have a single body of law applicable throughout the kingdom. Scotland has it is own distinctive system and courts, and in Northern Ireland certain spheres of law differ in substance from those operating in England and Wales. The main civil courts in England and Wales are: †¢ Magistrates’ Courts †¢ County Courts for small cases and †¢The High Court, which is divided into †¢ The Chancery Division, †¢ The Family Division, and †¢ The Queen’s Bench Division (including the maritime and commercial courts), for the more important cases†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (The United Kingdom Judicial System) But in United States of America the courts that operating are:- â€Å"†¦Supreme Courts consisted of six justices, who rode the circuit as judges of the Courts of Appeals. The courts was reduced to five members at one time and expended to ten at another. Since 1869, The Supreme Courts has consistently had nine members. And since 1891, the justices have no had to serve on courts of appeal, although each justice has some responsibilities with at least one appeals court†¦ † (Woll, 1992, p. 268) The differences are can be shown when comparing the administration on judiciary branch. In United States of America the judiciary branches are administered by congress because:- â€Å"†¦Generally, Congress determines the jurisdiction of the federal courts. In some cases, however — such as in the example of a dispute between two or more U. S. states — the Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction, an authority that cannot be stripped by Congress†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Judicial Branch) This showed us that the jurisdiction branches are dependable on congress to make an issue or solving problem regarding law for United States of America. Conclusion Conclusion that can be made from both of the countries in judiciary system are the system are totally different each other. The differences can be seen on the jurisdiction of judiciary branch, function of judiciary branch in both system that is parliamentary system and presidential system, type of Constitution, and administration of judiciary branch in United Kingdom and United State of America. The judiciary branch in both systems is totally different function in making or interprets law, because there are no similarities in judiciary for both system and countries. The comparison that been made useful to studying the differences roles of judiciary in different system of government and countries. How to cite The Differences Between Parliamentary Presidential System, Essay examples

General Motors Automobile Industry

Question: Discuss about theGeneral Motorsfor Automobile Industry. Answer: Introduction: General Motors is an American multinational company that operates in the automobile industry. Over the years, the company has expanded to global locations, and this has seen the firm grow both in profitability and market share. The companys leading brands include Vauxhall Chevrolet, Wuling, Buick, Cadillac, Opel, Holden, Baojun and Jiefang. General Motors prides itself with the diversity among its workforce and this is seen in its outlets around the world. In Australia the company has the Holden location which has over 2900 employees (Holden, 2016). Globally, General Motors has over 215,000 employees who help the company foster its operation in six continents. The global headquarters for the company is in Detroit, Michigan USA (General Motor, 2016). Regulatory Frameworks Affecting General Motors According to the Foreign Investment Review Board (2016), the Australia government encourages more multinational companies to operate in the country through sound regulation and policy. The government realizes that multinational firms that operate in Australia create jobs, bring with the innovative technology and foster competition among other local firms (Guzman, 2013). Although investment by multinational corporations is encouraged, it is up to the firms to ensure that they are in compliance with the regulations so that they can conduct their businesses without any disruptions. The following regulations and policies affect the operations of General Motors in Australia. Multinational corporations in Australia are synchronized by the Foreign Investment Review Board. Firstly, before General Motors was allowed to conducted business in Australia, it had to undergo various checks. The first part of the legal requirements was to provide a cover letter detailing the total investment made by General Motors. Moreover, the cover letter has to show the name of the parent company, its subsidiary locations in Australia as well as their addresses. The economic interest of the company in Australia had to be also stated as well as its overall ownership and control (Conley 2014, p.263). Secondly, the other policy that affects the operations of General Motors is the protections on national interests. The Australian government has to ensure that any multinational company that operates in the country does not compromise the community interests where it operates (Yu Chang and Thorson, 2010). If a firm is found to be violating national interests, then its license to operate in Australia is immediately terminated. The national interest test also provides wider benefits as it provides the government with flexibility on how it can think about strategic foreign investments (Conley 2014, p.263). General Motors has not violated any national interests since its operations in Australia have not caused any security concerns. Additionally, competition policies in Australia also affect the operations of General Motors. Competition in Australia is regulated through the competition policy that serves to protect consumers and other competitors from any uncompetitive practices. Australias substantive competition laws are outlined in Part IV of the Trade Practices Act 1974. This Act outlaws any anticompetitive contracts, price-fixing cartels, anticompetitive mergers and acquisitions as well as secondary boycotts that affect competition (Guzman 2011, p.163; Hope 2002, p.99). One of the aims of the competition policy is to ensure that the economy does not have many monopolies that, and to also ensure that the entry of multinational companies is smooth (Medalla, 2015, p.9). Globally, multinational corporations are known for tax avoidance, but in 2015, the federal government of Australia introduced measures that were aimed at combating the increase in tax avoidance by the firms.Currently, multinational firms like local firms pay a 30 percent corporation tax on their revenues to the federal government (Australian Tax Office, 2016). However, multinational firms such as General Motors are notorious for avoiding tax hence the measures that were put in place by the government to cub this trend. The new regulation applies to General Motors because its annual global turnover in over $1 billion hence the company has to pay the 30 percent corporation tax (PwC Australia, 2015). According to Bath (2015) the other policy that affects multinational firm operations in Australia is the behaviour of the foreign investor. The federal government uses this policy to check whether a firm is connected or in control by a foreign govern. This policy applies to the General Motors because the Australian government has to ensure that the firm is not under any influence from the U.S government in the course of its operations. Moreover, the federal government of Australia also explores the extent to which the U.S might exercise influence through the operations of General Motors. Treaties, Convections and Agreements The United States and Australia have a free-trade agreement that fosters smooth movement of goods as well as services between the two countries. According the U.S Office of the Trade Representative (2014) the treaty between the U.S and the Australian government facilitates duty-free movement of goods as well as services between the two countries. The immediate industries that benefited from this agreement included automobile, fabricated material and electrical appliances. This treaty impacts of the products of General Motors because it operates in the automobile industry which was of the beneficiaries from the treaty. Additionally, the treaty provides a mechanism for solving any disputes that arise in the course of conducting international trade. The convention concerning the Australian government as well as the United States government for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of Fiscal Elusion with respect to Taxes on income was put in place in 1982. Moreover, the convention was also amended after some years by a protocol that was reached in 2001 (Australian Government, 2016). Firstly, the protocol puts in place a preparation to an enterprise to ascertain all the benefits are earned via the sustainable plan that involves an entity which is acceptable. That it can undergo taxation where the permanent institution is located. Moreover, the Restriction on benefits article pursues to stop people who belong to associated states of employing interjected firms (IRS, 2016). According to this policy, within United States, a strategy discards acknowledgement that piles up the tax earnings as well as private keeping organization revenue like the union monetary gain tax that cannot be included along with the rule. However, for Australian side, the pattern again discards undiversified taxed earnings while ensuring that the particular mentions pertaining Australian taxation on money generation as well as crude resourcefulness lease taxation are included. Furthermore, the protocol goes ahead to amend the articles that are related to shipping as well as air transport. The protocol amends this article by widening the situations whereas undivided abidance nation taxes shall hold of a bleak boat rent of ships as well as aircrafts that are employed in the global dealings as well as utilization of sustenance instrumentations also utilized in multinational dealings (Australian Government, 2016). According to Australian Government (2016), the convention between America and Australia gives a variety of elisions towards common restriction of fifteen percent towards the mother nation taxes about the incentives. Thence, there is no taxation that can be levied from mother nation upon the incentives that the donee dignified firm occupant within another nation owns more than 80 percent voting ability from a firm compensating the incentives as well as satisfying particular condition that include the public necessities that are contained in the article of limitations of the benefits (Farrar Hiscock, 2015). Additionally, the interest upon parent nation taxes in stake beneath the policy stands at around ten percent. Thence, it is important to note that no taxation is applicable in the source nation on the interest that results from a government department of the partner country or even a financial institution resident in the other state. Royalties are also affected positively in the convention that is a boundary on parent nation taxes from the payment gets minimized. Charges for utilizing industrial, commercial as well as scientific equipment are also discarded and they are no longer associated with royalties. All these factors are for the purposes of the convention (Australian Taxation Office, 2016). General Motors as a multinational company that operates globally has been impacted by various conventions. Firstly, it is a beneficiary of all the investments as well as the service obligations that are stipulated. Consequently, this has led the multinational to increase investment flows to both countries further intensifying competition among other companies that operate in the same market. However, the tax treaty has also influenced the firms trade decisions. The introduction of the convention has influenced the firm to alter its trade behavior particularly by operating in ways that ensure that profits are lowered in the host country. References Australian Government, A. (2016). Australia and the United States treaty: key points. [online] Ato.gov.au. Available at: https://www.ato.gov.au/General/International-tax-agreements/In-detail/Tax-treaties/Australia-and-the-United-States-treaty---key-points/ [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. Australian Taxation Office, (2016). Combating multinational tax avoidance - a targeted anti-avoidance law | Australian Taxation Office. [online] Ato.gov.au. Available at: https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/International-tax-for-business/In-detail/Doing-business-in-Australia/Combating-multinational-tax-avoidance---a-targeted-anti-avoidance-law/ [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. Bath, V. (2015). The National Interest and Australian and Chinese Investment Law and Policy. Farrar, J. Hiscock, M. (2015), Australia's Trade, Investment and Security in the Asian Century Editors, 1st ed. Singapore: World Scientific. Conley, T. (2014). The vulnerable country: Australia and the Global Economy. [Sydney]: Read How You Want. Foreign Investment Review Board, (2016). Australian Foreign Investment Policy. 1st ed. [ebook] Available at: https://firb.gov.au/files/2015/09/Australias-Foreign-Investment-Policy-2016-2017.pdf [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. General Motors (2016). About General Motors | GM.com. [online] Available at: https://www.gm.com/company/about-gm.html [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. Guzman, A. (2013). Cooperation, comity, and competition policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Holden, (2016). Holden's Australian Future. [online] Holden.com.au. Available at: https://www.holden.com.au/about/our-company/our-future [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. Hope, E. (2016). Competition Policy Analysis. London: Routledge. IRS, I. (2016). Australia - Tax Treaty Documents. [online] Irs.gov. Available at: https://www.irs.gov/businesses/international-businesses/australia-tax-treaty-documents [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. Medalla, E. (2015). Competition policy in East Asia. New York [u.a.]: Routledge. PwC, (2015). Large and multinational businesses. [online] PwC. Available at: https://www.pwc.com.au/federal-budget-2015/multinational.html [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. U.S Office of the Trade Representative, (2014). Summary of the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement. [online] Ustr.gov. Available at: https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/fact-sheets/archives/2004/february/summary-us-australia-free-trade-agreement [Accessed 9 Aug. 2016]. Yu Chang, A. and Thorson, A. (2013). A legal guide to doing business in the Asia-Pacific. Chicago: American Bar Association, Section of International Law.